The first is the most frustrating, usually coming in the form of a rain date for Opening Day after just one game has been played. This is torture akin to someone giving you a slice of chocolate cake and taking it away after one bite.
Early season off-days are hiccups. You’re still getting the hang of baseball every day, trying to find your rhythm and they go and interrupt it. It’s rather frustrating, and while you might flip on another game to watch, it’s too early in the season for you to know who to be scoreboard watching against, making the emotional investment rather small.
As the weather heats up off-days become less of a hassle. You see the need for players to have a travel day, or a recovery day, to keep everyone fresh. Absence makes the heart grow fonder, and a day away from the Mets makes the next game all the more fun.
The ultimate off-day is the All-Star Game. The Mid-Summer Classic occurs near the half point of the season, giving everyone the perfect opportunity to take a breather and assess the situation. With no competitive games on what better way to utilize the time than some celebration of the players that make this game great?
After that off-days become strategic. It’s all about lining up the rotation to match your best guys up against your best competition if you’re competing, or getting guys rest and limiting the workload of young pitchers if you’re not.
Then you come to yesterday. The last off-day of the year. The baseball season is dying, and yesterday was a spooky preview of life without Mets baseball.
Which means tonight’s game might be the highest rated Mets game in September. The appreciation for life that comes just after a near-death experience. A cold night without the Mets that has us clutching to our Travis d’Arnaud‘s and Lucas Dudas.
The final off-day is also a window into the future of our time after baseball. Monday night football is on and the NHL preseason has begun. Many network television shows start debuting in September to start filling your DVR with non-baseball broadcasts.
13 baseball games remain over 13 days. Let’s enjoy every last fleeting moment of Mets baseball, because it won’t be long before we’re counting the days until Spring Training.
Budweiser extended it’s agreement with Major League Baseball by six years. This isn’t a new deal, it’s more than 30 years old, but the renewal of it may represent a lack of progress towards getting craft beer recognition at ballparks.
It’s fairly obvious that the big beer brands, including Budweiser, would rather the beer drinking public of America be as they feature it on television. Beer as mostly flavorless sustenance that is almost mandatory to have at any viewing of a sporting event. Leaving aside arguments that this reinforces the “Get drunk and belligerent” at ballgames attitude, because those people are looking for a place to party regardless of the entertainment provided. The ballgame is usually secondary to these people and it’s pointless to blame it on the beer and unfair to the rest of us that want to enjoy a beverage. Which is the point; there is a growing subset of fans that want to enjoy a beer at a game that’s a well-crafted tasty drink the same way fans in new ballparks are enjoying cuisine beyond hot dogs and peanuts these days.
Even if rumors of Budweiser actively pursuing ways to shut down craft beer taps, and not just at ballparks, are mostly exaggerated, Budweiser can afford to pay the big bucks for the prime real estate at a venue. This often means craft beer has to be almost hidden among kiosks and specialty stands in other areas. Don’t be confused by Big Apple Brews; while there are some good beers there, they’re all distributed by Anhauser Busch/InBev.
Even with Budweiser being the big player in beer at baseball games, craft beer has been making inroads more and more. Hopefully this continues.
Shannon at Mets Police writes up his feelings about why he loves getting to go out to Mets games and enjoying baseball.
It’s a nice enough warm summer night. Santana on the mound, friends, two beers (not eight), some food, 100 or so tweets, take some pics, maybe a blog post, a “free” t-shirt, #imwith28, a folk hero in Dickey, hanging with the tribe – all good things. All make me happy
Baseball is supposed to be fun. Yes, the nature of sports mean some times are not as fun, but if you can enjoy the experience even bad losses have that silver lining. You still hung out with some friends, got some fresh air, and still got to see all the wonderful things about baseball from home runs to devastating curve balls and sparkling defensive plays. Sometimes it’s the opposing team doing it. Sometimes there is comedy in the errors.
Even if it ends badly that doesn’t erase the three hours you were having fun.
And that’s my main take away from baseball. I’m going to note that the Mets are in the playoff picture even though it’s only June. I’m going to note winning streaks and the division champion losing. Because even if the Mets fall out of it on September first, I’ve had five months of happiness and enjoyment believing and rooting and hoping that the Mets will win tonight’s game.
Wouldn’t you rather look up in September and realize it’s been a fun ride and start really getting invested in whether they can take it home than keep looking for the trapdoors around every bend in the schedule? Isn’t it more fun to be excited about a team even if it ultimately fails than to remain un-invested until the last moment? Ike Davis may carry us over those trapdoors. R.A. Dickey may steer us around them.
I respect that everyone has different criteria to really believe in a team, and that many people put up these huge walls between watching and truly believing because they’re afraid of getting hurt and being let down. Some people race to the Internet after losing streaks or poor performances to proclaim that the Mets are what was expected of them in a way that seems like they’re almost chiding themselves for getting invested emotionally.
Getting invested emotionally is half the fun! This is the culture of being a sports fan. This is what makes Jordany Valdespin‘s first career hit being a go-ahead 3-run home run against the hated Phillies so amazin’. Or Dickey’s magical mystery tour. Or Kirk Nieuwenhuis‘ emergence and Rookie of the Year campaign. It’s the hopes and dreams that come along with these events. The understanding that enough helpings of improbable wins, circus catches and league-leading 2-out RBI could make the Mets pretty damn good. Deep down I think everyone knows this. It’s probably part of the reason there is a ground-swell of support for Valdespin getting more playing time despite hitting .222 and playing mostly bad defense over Daniel Murphy hitting .271 while playing mostly bad defense.
The emotional thrill of some of Valdespin’s big hits coupled with his swagger seem to have resonated with Mets fans.
“I was thinking I’m the man,” Valdespin said with a slight smile after his home run of Jonathan Papelbon.
A little bit of confidence in the face of improbable predictions of making the playoffs in 2012 goes a long way towards making the season exciting. It wasn’t just pure cockiness either, as Valdespin continued with a more humble appreciation of where he is.
“I’m just so happy,” he said, adding that his first phone call once he left Citizen’s Bank Park would be to San Pedro de Macoris, in the Dominican Republic, to his mother Maria.
“I want her to know this home run is for her. Because she’s the person who put me here to do this.”
Maybe Jordany’s mix of humble appreciation for being in the Major Leagues coupled with the cocky appreciation for the team’s big hits will be a nice story going forward. Maybe Daniel Murphy shakes off his slump with a three home run week. It’s not one against the other, as they’re on the same team. I’m rooting for both of them.
I give the mainstream media a lot of grief for creating silly Mets-hating narratives, but creating narratives can be fun. Don’t we love Dickey’s story? Still, him climbing a mountain in the offseason does not actually make him a better pitcher or mean he’s destined to win 30 games this season. That doesn’t change that it’s a fun story or that he’s a entertaining guy to root for. The Mets being a ‘gritty’ team may not actually mean anything more than statistical randomness, but it’s still fun to get into it when the Mets are scratching out 9th inning wins against good pitchers, working counts to chase starters early, or executing bunt base-hits when the defensive situation calls for it.
No one knows where this Mets team is going. Not me, not you, not sports radio hosts or national baseball writers. Sandy Alderson does not know, nor does Terry Collins or even David Wright. They believe though. No one can predict the future, and no one has all the data required to give you odds. The season so far is a huge example of that. Everyone tried to tell you what would happen with Johan Santana, and pretty much everyone was wrong.
There are so many unpredictable things in baseball. Things go right and things go wrong and some things are just awesome. So instead of sleeping in the back of the train waiting for something to jolt you awake, enjoy the scenery and imagine the beautiful places the train may be taking you to. You may not end up where you imagine, but I can guarantee you’ll see some amazin’ places along the way. Believe it.
A lot has been made about the Mets run differential so far this year, and how it suggests that the Mets should have lost a lot more games than they have. They’re 32-29, but the Pythagorean formula says that with 262 runs scored and 281 runs allowed they should be 29-32. They’re at a point where winning a 3-2 game may get them a win, but will hurt their Pythagorean record.
Math does not have a memory. If the Mets play well enough to win a one run game, then they get a victory which suggests a .6774 winning percentage (110 wins) via Pythagorean. However if they get blown out 14-5, they get one loss but Pythagorean suggests a .1319 winning percentage (21 wins). Combined that’s a .2195 winning percentage (36 wins). Take the Mets record over the last 10 games. They are 4-6, but their 42:37 runs scored to runs allowed ratio suggests they should be 6-4.
This is all nonsense really, because I’m just cherry-picking games. The logic to it all is that overall you need to score more runs than you allow to win baseball games. There is no inherent talent (besides things like using mop-up relievers that make blowouts bigger blowouts) or ability that allows teams to scatter those runs in a way that groups all of the runs allowed into a couple of games and spread the runs scored more evenly so that they win a lot more games than they lose. That’s simply luck. A team that scores 3.5 runs a game but allows 4 runs a game should lose more often that it will win. For the entire season. Runs do group though through luck and randomness and late inning replacements in out of reach games, and a near even run differential rarely means a team loses or wins mostly close games.
Manny Acosta has given up 29 runs this season. Last season he gave up only 21 runs all year (although he started in June) to a rate of .4468 runs given up per inning. If we’d have had that Manny Acosta so far, he’d only have given up nine runs, rounded up. Acosta is pitching to a 11.86 ERA, which has accounted for a ton of those runs allowed. This is why run differential is not predictive of how the Mets will do going forward. The Mets removed a key input, Manny Acosta, from the equation and he won’t be around to give up more runs. If he does return, it’ll be because he’s pitching better and won’t be giving up runs at the same rate.
Let’s compare the run differential if we’d had the 2011 version of Manny Acosta. Instead of 262 runs scored and 281 allows the Mets would have scored 262 runs and allowed 261. Aha! A positive run differential. As I’m sure you can guess, that comes out to a .502 winning percentage via Pythagorean and 81 wins. The Mets are only three games above that, which isn’t an unreasonable deviation.
What run differential predictions forget is that teams and managers make changes. Manny Acosta is only one example of that. The Mets will make, and have made, other bullpen changes. They’ll make offense changes to to try to score more runs. Ike Davis will hopefully learn how to play baseball again, Daniel Murphy is almost a lock to score more runs than he has been. The Mets current run differential has roughly zero correlation to what we can expect from this team going forward; it only tells us about what they’ve done so far.
Memorable series in Toronto? Perhaps not. The Mets flirted more with last place than with first this weekend, but they got out of the country with a win and perhaps that’s a step forward.
No NL East team swept this weekend, providing the Mets some solace. The Mets also have managed to squeak out some wins while they’ve been struggling, perhaps doing some good towards minimizing the damage. Avoiding long losing streaks is a good way to avoid undoing all the progress you’ve made during winning streaks, and simply being 4-6 over the last 10 instead of 2-8 has done that. A good way to have a winning record is to win more games when you’re playing well than you lose when you’re playing poorly, since all teams do both for at least some portion of the season.
It’s important to minimize the length of said losing streaks as well, and for the last couple of decades the National League’s favorite way to do that has been to face the Pittsburgh Pirates. The Mets will travel to Pittsburgh for a three game set, and while it’s true that they’re not a good team, it’s important to note that they rank 3rd in the NL in team ERA and the Mets will be facing their two best pitchers in Bedard and McDonald. The counter argument is of course that the Pirates can’t hit a lick and the Mets will be tossing the top of their rotation as well, with Johan Santana, R.A. Dickey and Jon Niese getting the starts.
It’s worth noting that the Mets are three games over .500 more than a quarter of the way through the season and haven’t been a losing team even for one game all season long despite being almost universally picked to finish last. It isn’t because everything has clicked either. The starters have probably been better than expected overall, but they’ve been prone to absolute disaster starts as well. The bullpen is incredibly streaky, and it almost seems that as Frank Francisco goes, so go the Mets. The offense that should’ve been the Mets best feature has been spotty, although David Wright is hitting for two. Ike Davis has been pretty much a disaster and the two positions that the Mets really didn’t have any depth, shortstop and catcher, are two positions the Mets faced injuries at . Both Ruben Tejada and Josh Thole went down while putting up strong offensive numbers, and their backups certainly aren’t up to par.
And still the Mets roll on. Time to take care of some Pirates.
I don’t usually do game recaps, and I don’t usually buy into “they would’ve lost this one last year” arguments trying to compare this team to that one. This game was too much fun not to keep talking about though.
Halladay gave up a hard hit ball to lead off the game that required a great catch to turn into an out, but after that he was pretty steady until the 6th when a tight zone and good patience by Andres Torres with two outs led to a walk. Nieuwenhuis laced a single into left and that brought up our uncrowned Captain. David Wright rocketed one down the line that Mayberry misplayed off the side wall and two runs scored to tie the game. Meanwhile Jon Niese battled some control problems but only allowed those two early runs through five innings.
The Mets would battle and fight through the next couple of innings, having runners on base and not scoring and allowing runners to reach base but not allowing them to score. Josh Thole may have suffered a concussion, which sucks.
If you believe in poetic moments and turning points in seasons there was a huge one in the 7th inning. With two on and one out Hunter Pence grounded to second base where Daniel Murphy flipped to Justin Turner who threw to first. Shane Victorino slid a good three feet wide of the bag to take out Justin Turner and was ruled out for interference. You may recall a similar play in late August of 2007. It was the top of the ninth in Philadelphia with Marlon Anderson on first and Endy Chavez on third with one out and the Phillies leading 3-2. Shawn Green grounded out to shortstop and Anderson went in hard at second, keeping Rollins from turning the double play and allowing Endy Chavez to tie the game. Except Anderson was ruled to have interfered on a play much less clear cut than last nights. Instead the Mets lost that game, got swept in a four game series against the Phillies, and failed to completely bury them in the division. That one game may have been the difference between the playoffs and what ultimately happened in 2007. Who knows how things are different from there. Now the Mets get one of those calls that helps them win a game and go back to three games over .500 and 2.5 games ahead of the last place Philadelphia Phillies. Is it karma? The universe correcting it’s course back to one that features the Mets establishing a dynasty and perennial playoff team? Is it the turning point in a season that the Mets were universally picked to finish last but haven’t been under .500 at any point?
Probably not. It was a great win culminated by Jordany Valdespin collecting his first major league hit in epic fashion with a 3-run home run off one of the game’s best closers. It instantly became a Mets classic, but it’s still just one win in May. The Mets will face so many ups and downs and turning points this season that it’ll be near impossible to pinpoint this game in May when it all started going right. Would the Mets have won this game last year? Well..maybe. After all, many people compared this game to the Omir Santos game winning home run off of Papelbon back in 2009. 2009′s team doesn’t seem like one that you’d describe as resilient, having been the first losing season since 2004.
Still, there’s a lot to like about this game. The Mets hung in there against a tough pitcher. Jon Niese didn’t let the wheels fall off. Except for Torres misplay in the first allowing Jimmy Rollins an extra base, they played pretty crisp defense. They made pitches when they needed to and exploited the Phillies weaknesses. They took a four game losing streak and responded with a three game, and counting, winning streak.
Is this season going to be a gusty team that fights and scraps to stay above .500? A scrappy contender that finds a way to get at least a wild card spot? An overachieving bunch of rookies that show promise but ultimately revert to what they were predicted to be? It’s too early to tell, but no matter where it winds up it’s going to be a fun ride.
It’s time for May’s Mets Ticket Giveaway, courtesy of Seatcrew.com. This week Optimistic Mets Fan is giving away two tickets to a game against the Milwaukee Brewers on Tuesday May 15th.
Seatcrew.com is a secondary ticket market similar to Stubhub with an important twist: There are no ticket fees for the buyer or the seller, which means lower prices on tickets for you. For a full write-up, and a list of which games you have a chance to win tickets to, check out my post from the offseason.
So here’s what you have to do to win. First, you need to have a registered Seatcrew account. All you need is an email address. Second, you need to predict how many hits David Wright will hit against the Phillies in three games. This means you need to have your guess in to email@example.com before Wright’s first AB tonight. There is one catch: Since this is an Optimistic fan site, we’ll be playing by reverse Price is Right rules. This means the person closest to the total without going UNDER is the winning entry. If you guess 4 hits, and David Wright hits 5, your guess is ineligible. Be Optimistic.
If it helps, the Phillies are scheduled to start Roy Halladay, Joe Blanton, and Cliff Lee returning from the DL. My personal guess would be 6 hits, with 2 home runs if you’d like to use that as a guide. Good Luck!
The Mets are now 2-1 in series sweeps. It’s never a good thing when you get swept, and it doesn’t even matter who the opponent is. Obviously you tend to eye weaker teams with the thought that you’re supposed to get a few free wins off them, but that’s not how baseball works. The Mets ran into the Astros while they were playing well, with the back of the rotation, with a still struggling Ike Davis, and with a couple of players affected by the flu. It’d be as foolish to eye these three games and use it as confirmation bias that the Mets are a last place quality team as it would be to take the 3-0 sweep of the Braves as evidence that the Mets will win the division.
So it’s time for the Mets to crawl home and lick their wounds, reassess the fifth spot in the rotation, and maybe the last bullpen spot as well. Meanwhile the Yankees just lost two of three to the team picked to finish last in their division. The Phillies and Braves traded bullpen explosions through 11 innings before Chipper Jones made it 15-13, final. Roy Halladay started that game btw. Chris Schwinden or Roy Halladay, the result was the same.
Perspective. Sweeps suck and the Mets have a lot of adjustments to make. They’ve been knocked to the mat, but they’ve got plenty of time to stand back up and start swinging. They’ve got a day to dust themselves off and go back on attack mode. Certainly they could take this blow and keep reeling, but I think the Mets have shown a tendency to bounce back pretty well under Terry Collins. They’re due for some home runs, and hopefully as the weather warms up a little and Ike warms up a little, they’ll start hitting more. Scoring more, winning more, and hopefully pitching better to boot. May starts out 0-2, but plenty of time to salvage that. The six games against the Phillies will be important in distancing themselves from them in the standings so that if and when they get Chase Utley, Ryan Howard, and Cliff Lee back the Mets have some breathing room.
This isn’t a guide to every last detail of Port St. Lucie, but I’d like to share my observations about watching the Mets down there. Tonight is the first televised broadcast, and also the first audio broadcast.
The most interesting part, in my opinion, is the morning workouts. These occur pretty much every day, even on non-game days, on the fields behind Digital Domain Park. You’ll see the entire camp full of players out there, except ones that may be playing in an away game, doing workouts and drills. Minor and major leaguers in all shades of Mets uniforms wearing all sorts of different numbers. You’ll see guys you’ve never heard of, even if you pay pretty close attention to the minor leagues. They’ll do all sorts of interesting drills and you’ll see the coaches and managers barking orders and instructions. You’ll get an inside look at how players prepare for games and seasons. You’ll see them practice learning the signs and just doing baseball things. Sometimes the minor leaguers will start playing a game near the end of the session, this is normally the time the regular players retreat to Digital Domain Park to prepare for the regular game. Usually you’ll be asked to leave, but sometimes you can catch an inning or two.
You can get autographs if you’re persistent, but during workouts these guys are mostly working so you’ll have to be quick and paying attention to who may have a moment. They’ll have to walk by you to get from field to field, and often this is when they’ll sign. Another good time to get autographs is after games, particularly if it’s an away game and the players are headed back to a bus or their cars if it’s close. When the Mets travel to nearby Jupiter to play the Cardinals or the Marlins, many players drive. Many people looking for autographs wait in the walkway between the players’ exit and their parking lot. This is also a good way to get a look at what cars players drive. Autographs are there to be had, so if that’s your thing you should have no problem. Normal rules apply; if you’re a cute girl or a kid you’ve got the best shot.
Spring Training tickets are often not expensive, and it’s a chance to get seats that are really close that would be virtually impossible to get at a Major League park. The atmosphere is so much more relaxed and casual and it’s a fun time all around. Both years I went I sat first row in front of the Mets bullpen, literally within touching distance of all the pitchers as they warmed up to go in. Close enough that they can here what you’re saying to the people you’re with. There are season ticket holders in Florida, but there are still seats available mere rows behind home plate too. And it’s roughly 10% of the cost of a Major League stadium.
Another fun activity that’s probably more common in places like Port St. Lucie than Tampa Bay is player-spotting out on the town. Most people know about Duffy’s, a chain restaurant with a bowling alley attached down the road from the Spring Training Complex. SNY films some segments there, and it’s a common place for players to hang out too. The Mets do bowling nights on Sunday evenings, so if you want to watch baseball players playing a different sport that’s the perfect time. Port St. Lucie is not a tiny place, but it’s not a city so there are only a limited amount of places to go for a nightlife experience. Another good place is Vine and Barley which is a wine and beer bar down the road. The last time I was down there I ran into Scott Hairston, Justin Turner, and Kai Gronauer, and I’m pretty sure there were one or two players down there I didn’t recognize. Even on a non-baseball front I suggest this place, as it’s got self-serve wine tastings and an excellent beer menu.
The worst part of Spring Training is when you return home. You’re so ready for baseball that it feels wrong that there are no longer games you can attend. Still, it’s great time and a must-do for baseball fans. It’s baseball and warm weather and a great way to start to get excited about the new season. If you’re headed down this year, have a great time and tweet lots of pictures!
Tags: autographs, Baseball, duffy's, florida, grapefruit league, mets at duffys, mets bowling night, mets player watching, mets spring training, New York Mets, port st lucie, Spring Training, spring training autographs, spring training workouts, vine and barley
There is an interesting juxtaposition among Mets fans that talk about things like trading Wright or letting Reyes walk. The same people that justify this with statements about not competing for years and being in rebuilding mode seem offended that some (I’d say many) Mets fans suggest they’ll be much less interested in the Mets if Reyes leaves.
There’s always a lot of comparison, as well as attempts to avoid comparison, to the Yankees with the Mets. They share a city and compete for the same entertainment dollar. The common rhetoric among Mets fans is that the Yankees fans are front-running morons that only care about yelling about how many rings they’ve won and that Mets fans are truer fans that love the team, good or bad. If a vastly diverse group of millions of Mets fans can agree on anything, it’s that Jose Reyes is a talented baseball player that’s fun to watch. At what point does it stop being about watching your favorite players play your favorite game and start becoming about being a consistent winner?
What is baseball without the season, with the ups and downs of a 162 game scheduled filled with bad breaks and huge hits and the ebbs and flows of stress and emotion? I don’t follow the Mets for optimal lineup constructions and high-value controlled commodities. I watch the Mets because I love baseball and I’ve formed an attachment to the players that have worn the uniform year after year. Jose Reyes is one of those players. He’s a life-long Met and it’s hard to imagine him anywhere else. The Mets have other good players, but there is something special about Jose Reyes and his fun-loving attitude. Perhaps it’s the way he seems to love playing the game as much as we love watching him play it.
Sure it’s possible to make arguments about injury risks and long contracts that suggest perhaps giving Reyes too much money or too many years may be detrimental to the long term success of the franchise, but frankly I’d rather take my chances with Reyes. Those risks exist with every player in every circumstance, and if you’re not going to take a chance with a fan-favorite and top of the line player at a sparse position, what are you even doing? Reyes is already bordering on legendary Mets status, and that’s not something that comes along every day. Mike Piazza came here when he was great, Dwight Gooden left in 1994 and Darryl Strawberry before him. Ignoring that there is long-term financial value to having legends to invite back to Citi Field in the future, do we really want to let one walk away for what’s some kind of ’smart process of value contracts and prospect development’? A couple more years and the Mets record book will be Jose Reyes’ biography, with a guest appearance by David Wright.
The Mets have struggled for years now with collapses followed by injuries followed by just about everything else. Now you want to take the most exciting player on the team away too? While I’ll always be a Mets fan, there comes a point when it’s hard to see the light at the end of the tunnel. It’s easy to say that we need things to stabilize, for bad contracts to work their way off the payroll and for prospects to mature and contribute at the fraction of the cost, but in the meantime other teams are playing baseball and competing for the postseason and doing all sorts of wonderful things. Taking seasons off is not the way to build a perennial contender. Every year the Mets spend in rebuilding mode, defined by me as letting Reyes go and not replacing him with at least as much talent, is a year that customers find other ways to spend their entertainment dollar. Some will go to the Yankees, some will switch to other sports. Some will stop watching with their kids who will spend more time on video games, movies, or something else entirely. Husbands will take their wives out to a nice dinner instead of to Citi Field, because maybe without Reyes, and winning, they don’t feel it’s worth the traffic and the rushing home from work.
Building a winner will eventually repair the damage, but even if you could guarantee repeated success it takes time to rebuild a fan base. The Yankees had a healthy amount of fans show up, but even in 2000 they were 8th in total attendance. The difference was that payrolls hadn’t yet skyrocketed to the levels they are at now. The Yankees payroll in 2000 would be the 13th highest payroll in 2011. It was still possible for teams to maintain a rebuilding payroll and keep some talented stars while keeping revenues at or above payroll. The way I see it, the Mets can’t easily get their payroll down that low, so they need to work on keeping revenues up. Reyes can’t do it all by himself, but coupled with the right moves he could be the difference between the Mets raising attendance to 2.6 million or it dropping to 1.7. Just in ticket prices alone, a swing like that more than pays Reyes salary per year. Factor in revenue associated with advertising prices based on TV ratings and fans in the seats viewing them on the walls and it’s an even starker difference. I find it hard to believe that having Jose Reyes playing baseball in New York can’t be profitable, and it’s certainly possible, even likely, that Jose Reyes can be a part of the success even four years from now.
There is never a guarantee that smart moves focused on the long term will lead to continued success. There is no formula Sandy Alderson can follow that means the Mets will definitely be a perennial contender in 2014 and beyond. Prospects, even highly touted ones, hurt themselves or flame out. Free agent acquisitions that look like can’t misses age badly or under perform in a new environment. Other teams in the division and/or league do a better job, or get luckier, in scouting and signing players and suddenly no one knows what the solution is for out-performing them. It’s not hard to get into a cycle of suck like the Pittsburgh Pirates, constantly looking for All-Star prospects that maybe have a good year or two and than take off for greener pastures while the team struggles to even play at .500. The best you can do is put yourself in a situation every year where the right set of circumstances gets you into the playoffs. For the Mets that means keeping Jose Reyes. It probably also means hoping Johan Santana stays on the field and is still pretty good at pitching, and that other players stay healthy as well. It may be a long shot, but if you don’t keep yourself in the game you often miss opportunities.
I was at the game this year when Jose Reyes felt that first hamstring tightness and left the game. It was a packed house for a Subway Series game, and Tejada jogging out to shortstop was like a punch in the gut. I watched the rest of the game in a daze, barely caring about the result. Reyes had such a great first half that there were road games in May that I was reminding myself to make sure I turned the game on in time, because Reyes would lead off and I might miss something special. There are reasons to watch bad teams because even bad or average players hit for cycles, throw pitching gems, and smash home runs. They can stage remarkable comebacks and rock opposing aces and there’s always the looming possibility that someone will throw that no-hitter. Without Jose Reyes the chances of something magical happening go down.
Faith and Fear in Flushing, in an awards presentation to Jose Reyes, makes similar points and sums up my feelings pretty well in this quote.
except for habit and a lifetime of devotion, I can’t think of a good, rational reason to get squarely behind this team if you’re not on it.
Tags: Baseball, how to rebuild, Jose Reyes, jose reyes is awesome, jose reyes' replacement, major league baseball, mets payroll, mets reyes, New York Mets, please stay jose, re-sign reyes, rebuilding, reyes, rooting for the mets, watching baseball